forum Debate. Debate. Debate.

Started March 14, 2019 by Deleted user

tune

Edit topic

Like I said, you have the right to be sexually active/attracted to people, but you do not have the right to have sex outside at the park, or have sex with, say, Emma Watson.

nobody said you're owed sex, dom
I think we all know that here

Once again, I tripped over myself. But many people insist Right = owed something.

So two things.

1. Retard and any word making a portmanteau of that word is deeply offensive and should be treated as such.
2. The most important Right is ownership.

So two things.

1. Retard and any word making a portmanteau of that word is deeply offensive and should be treated as such.
2. The most important Right is ownership.

1. Straight facts
2. Could you elaborate? Ownership of the self, property, or weapons? Or all of the above?

So two things.

1. Retard and any word making a portmanteau of that word is deeply offensive and should be treated as such.
2. The most important Right is ownership.

1. Yep, and the trivialization of it is ~annoying~ to me as an autistic person.
2. Idk. You'd have to list the other rights so I can decide.

My immediate reaction to "ownership is the most important right" is that no, freedom of expression (speech, religion, press) is. But I'm not really sure what Dom means, so I don't know if I agree. I will say that the ownership of the self, to me at least, goes along with the first amendment rights because it's basically protection of identity.

The ability to own in general. Especially the fact that all are owed the legal right of self ownership.

have we discussed the age old question: is it gay to kiss the homies?

It's only gay if you make it gay

no.
unless you want it to be gay.
in which case yes.

I do not consider it gay.
I am gay
but I do kiss the homies as well
it's the Homie Law

Personally I think platonic cuddling regardless of gender should be more common.

^^^^^
that

kissing the homies is friendship, not lust

opinions on neopronouns/xenogenders

i know there’s a mental, psychological reason behind why people choose to identify as a xenogender (most of the time) or use a neopronoun and that’s fine and all, won’t stop me from thinking it’s odd though (no offense meant to anyone here who does use them)

just as someone who’s first language and not even my second language isn’t English neopronouns trip me out

also no, unless you make it so, or your homie does, or you both mutually agree that it’s gay, it is not gay to kiss the homies.

It ain't gay to kiss the homies
It's homiesexual
I'll see myself out

It ain't gay to kiss the homies
It's homiesexual
I'll see myself out

I-

that just sounds like demi with extra steps

that just sounds like demi with extra steps

It started out as a squish
How did it end up like this
It was only a squish
It was only a squish..

The ability to own in general. Especially the fact that all are owed the legal right of self ownership.

Is anyone going to challenge this? This is a philosophical breakthrough. For me anyways.

You mean we have the legal right to not be a slave? Or what?
I'M NOT CHALLENGING YOU DOM, I'M JUST CONFUSED. I REPEAT, THIS IS NOT A CHALLENGE

We have the moral right to be able to say "This thing is mine." and have others respect that. Especially related to our person, our Stuff, our choices, and our land.

I've been discussing this with multiple people, feel free to ignore.
The NHS is using the rainbow as their symbol ever since the quarantine. Should it be considered theft or something of the sort of the LGBTQ Community's symbol?

What's the NHS?

It's the National Health Service, it's the public health service in the UK, so people are using the symbol to thank the NHS for what they've been doing over the course of the quarantine

Ah. No, it's not theft. We don't own the rainbow, and it's sort of dumb to say "you can't use these six colors together!"
It'd be one thing if the NHS was using some sort of symbol like the Apple apple or the Nike swoosh, but honestly it's really ridiculous to say it's theft to use the rainbow.

The rainbow isn't trademarked. Anyone arguing like it is is dumb.

That's fair. I'm just going to argue opposite for the sake of it~
It feels like the rainbow has always kind of been universally acknowledged as a queer symbol and has represented the community for a long time, and that giving it a different meaning kind of takes away from what it's come to mean.

A long time?

Since 1978 apparently